The Infrastructure Gap Series: A Better Model – Trust-Based Philanthropy with VC Standards

Part 3: Where we are in the series

In Part 1, we made the case that operational infrastructure is the variable that determines whether nonprofit funding produces real impact – and that closing the infrastructure gap is a shared responsibility between funders and nonprofits. In Part 2, we looked at how the two dominant funding models leave impact on the table, and what philanthropy could learn from how venture capital invests in operational success.

Now we get to the question that matters most: what does a better model look like, and how do we build it?

VI. The Partnership Model – Combining the Best of Both Worlds

So what does a better model actually look like?

Not solely restricted grantmaking, with its rigid controls and starvation-level overhead. And not trust-based philanthropy taken to the extreme, where funders step back so far they stop engaging with whether their investment is succeeding. The truth is that trust-based philanthropy has the right instincts – respect for nonprofit expertise, flexibility, reduced administrative burden, real partnership. It’s the direction the sector should be heading. But trust without structure leaves too much to chance, and the organizations that need support the most are the ones least equipped to succeed without it.

The better model is simple to name, even if it’s harder to build: trust-based philanthropy with venture capital standards. Take the values of trust-based philanthropy – the respect, the flexibility, the partnership – and pair them with the operational rigor that makes venture capital such an effective investment model. Trust the leaders. Respect their expertise. Give them flexibility. And then do what any serious investor does: make sure they have what they need to succeed, stay engaged throughout the relationship, and treat their success as your responsibility too.

That means operating from trust – but making that trust earned. It means providing flexibility – but within a framework that ensures organizations have what they need to use that flexibility well. It means respecting nonprofit expertise – while acknowledging that expertise in a mission doesn’t automatically translate to expertise in running an organization.

What a healthy funding partnership looks like

The table below outlines baseline expectations for a strong funding partnership. This isn’t a prescription – it’s a starting point for both sides to understand what they’re responsible for and what they should expect from each other.

Like this article? Subscribe to our blog on Substack.
Share on LinkedIn or the EA Forum

Missed Part 2? Read it here.

Tuesday, June 9th
12:00 PM – 12:30 PM EST

Sarah Goodman of Offit Kurman joins us for Compliance Without Chaos: HR, Benefits & Risk. We will walk through fundraising compliance and what it takes to protect your 501c3 status, with a practical checklist you can apply inside your organization.

Join us on Tuesday, June 9th for a free session designed to help you move forward without second-guessing what compliance requires of your organization.

This session is focused on implementation. You will leave with tools you can apply right away, along with the opportunity to ask questions during live Q&A.

Register via the link below.

Thank you to our sponsor: Offit Kurman